<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimizing leakage for high-performance CMOS circuits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/</link>
	<description>Tutorials and Insights in Electronics and Circuit Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Friedel</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Friedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Dear Poojan,

I agree that reverse bias helped in the &quot;good old days&quot; of  process nodes like 180nm.
But if you simulate the bulk effect in e.g. 45nm, you will see that the 1000x Ids leakage reduction in 180nm will shrink to &lt;10x best case in 45nm.
On top of the Ids leakage, gate leakage gets more pronounced!

Thanks
Friedel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Poojan,</p>
<p>I agree that reverse bias helped in the &#8220;good old days&#8221; of  process nodes like 180nm.<br />
But if you simulate the bulk effect in e.g. 45nm, you will see that the 1000x Ids leakage reduction in 180nm will shrink to &lt;10x best case in 45nm.<br />
On top of the Ids leakage, gate leakage gets more pronounced!</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Friedel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poojan Wagh</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Poojan Wagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>@Bapcha Murty:
I concur. I think the high-side switch is the way to go. However, there &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; some benefits of the reverse body bias. I just wanted to give as many options out there as possible for my readers and let them decide. Their decision, nonetheless, should be to just use a switch 90% of the time.

Could you explain what you mean by increasing sidewall capacitance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bapcha Murty:<br />
I concur. I think the high-side switch is the way to go. However, there <em>are</em> some benefits of the reverse body bias. I just wanted to give as many options out there as possible for my readers and let them decide. Their decision, nonetheless, should be to just use a switch 90% of the time.</p>
<p>Could you explain what you mean by increasing sidewall capacitance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bapcha Murty</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bapcha Murty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>1. Reverse body bias will require that you do a custom layout to minimize the chances of latching up - plus, you will end up increasing CJSW [side-wall capacitance].

2. Stacking devices - as in the supply switch circuit - will decrease DC power and standby power, but you need LARGE enable transistors to implement a high-speed circuit.

Intuitively, I think that using the reverse body bias to eke out better performance is a bad engineering trade-off to make, while I&#039;d be more comfortable with the switched power supply solution.

Bapcha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Reverse body bias will require that you do a custom layout to minimize the chances of latching up &#8211; plus, you will end up increasing CJSW [side-wall capacitance].</p>
<p>2. Stacking devices &#8211; as in the supply switch circuit &#8211; will decrease DC power and standby power, but you need LARGE enable transistors to implement a high-speed circuit.</p>
<p>Intuitively, I think that using the reverse body bias to eke out better performance is a bad engineering trade-off to make, while I&#8217;d be more comfortable with the switched power supply solution.</p>
<p>Bapcha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimizing leakage for high-performance CMOS circuits &#124; Circuit Design</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimizing leakage for high-performance CMOS circuits &#124; Circuit Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost recently, he is working in the areas of analog-to-digital converter design in [&#8230;] Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptMost recently, he is working in the areas of analog-to-digital converter design in [&#8230;] Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typical CMOS device/process options &#124; Circuit Design</title>
		<link>http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Typical CMOS device/process options &#124; Circuit Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.circuitdesign.info/blog/2008/12/minimizing-leakage-for-high-performance-cmos-circuits/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, each of these options have the implicit tradeoff of performance/speed at the expense of leakage. What do you do when you want performance during active operation and low leakage during a standby mode? I will detail two methods in a future article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, each of these options have the implicit tradeoff of performance/speed at the expense of leakage. What do you do when you want performance during active operation and low leakage during a standby mode? I will detail two methods in a future article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

